Advanced English II (BFE19013)

Week 6: Pragmatics — Speech Acts and Politeness

Instructor: Miao Zhang 張淼

What can we do with a question?

Could you get the door for me?

Is the speaker asking about ability, asking for the water, or doing both?

First read

  • What the speaker says,
  • what the speaker likely wants,
  • and what the hearer might do.

Part I: Speech as action

Language can perform actions

With words, people can:

  • ask, answer, and inform;
  • promise, apologise, and thank;
  • invite, refuse, warn, and request.

Speech Act Theory asks what people do in saying something.

One utterance, three questions

You can leave the door open.

  1. What words were produced?
  2. What act is the speaker performing?
  3. What effect might the words have on the hearer?

Locution: what was said?

The locution is the utterance produced: its words and linguistic form.

You can leave the door open.

The speaker uses a declarative sentence.

Illocution: what act is performed?

The illocution is the communicative act performed in saying the utterance.

In our example, the speaker makes a request.

The request is still a request even if the hearer says no.

Perlocution: what effect follows?

The perlocution is an effect the utterance has on a hearer.

  • the hearer opens the door;
  • the hearer refuses;
  • if the hearer choose not to comply, they may need to provide a reason why.

An effect is NOT guaranteed by the speaker’s intention.

Practice 1: separate the layers

The instructor says, I’ll upload the grades by next week.

  1. What is the locution?
  2. What is the illocution?
  3. Name two possible perlocutions.

Debrief: do not confuse act and effect

The illocution is a commitment.

Possible effects include reassurance, doubt, or no reaction at all.

  • The speaker’s act does not depend on the hearer’s response.
  • A useful analysis distinguishes the act from its consequences.

A small but important caution

An utterance can perform more than one act.

I’m sorry I missed your call. I was in class.

It may apologise and explain. Context and co-text help us decide which act is foregrounded.

Take a short break

10 minutes

Part II: When form and function differ

Compare two requests

Close the window.

Could you close the window?

Which sentence is grammatically a question? Which one is likely a request?

Form is not function

The first utterance has imperative form and can function as a directive.

The second has interrogative form but can also function as a directive.

Grammatical form alone does not identify the speech act.

Direct speech acts

An act is direct when the sentence form and communicative function correspond straightforwardly.

  • declarative → assertion;
  • interrogative → question;
  • imperative → order or request.

Indirect speech acts

An act is indirect when the intended illocution is not simply the act suggested by the sentence form.

Could you pass the water?

Its form asks about ability; in many contexts its function is to request the water.

Infer the request step by step

  1. The utterance is phrased as a question about ability.
  2. The water is on the hearer’s side of the table.
  3. The speaker is reaching toward it.
  4. A request is more relevant than an ability test.

The listener uses context to infer the illocution and also follows the Gricean’s maxims.

Test the same words in another context

Could you lift this box?

  • a real question about physical ability?
  • a request to help lift the box?
  • or both at once?

What would you need to know to choose among these interpretations?

Conventional and less predictable indirectness

Some forms are familiar as requests:

  • Can you open the door?
  • Would you mind moving your bag?

Other interpretations depend more on the local context:

A: Let’s go to the movies tonight.

B: I have to study for an exam.

What is B doing?

B’s words give information about studying.

In this exchange, they may also function as a refusal of A’s invitation.

The first act is explicit; the second is inferred from the sequence and situation.

Practice 2: read the context

For each utterance, write two possible functions and one context clue that would support each:

  1. It’s getting late.
  2. Do you have a pen?
  3. I have a lot of work to do.

Debrief: make your interpretation testable

Use this frame:

“In this context, X may function as Y, because Z.”

Then ask: what alternative interpretation remains possible?

A short method for analyzing speech acts

  1. Record the exact wording.
  2. Describe its grammatical form.
  3. Identify the likely illocution.
  4. Point to contextual evidence.
  5. Note a plausible alternative or uncertainty.

This keeps analysis from becoming a guess about a speaker’s private thoughts.

Take a short break

10 minutes

Part III: Politeness and face

A request can affect a relationship

You need someone to move a bag blocking the aisle.

How might you ask a close friend? A new classmate? An instructor?

Write one version for two different relationships.

Compare the wording

Move your bag.

Could you move your bag, please?

Would you mind moving your bag?

What changes? What stays the same?

Politeness in pragmatics

Politeness frameworks examine how linguistic choices relate to social expectations and relationships.

  • who is speaking to whom;
  • their relative roles and relationship;
  • what the situation requires;
  • how the utterance is delivered.

Face

In the Brown and Levinson framework, face refers to the public self-image participants want to maintain.

  • Positive face: the wish to be approved of or included.
  • Negative face: the wish to have freedom of action and avoid imposition.

Why might a request threaten face?

A request may ask someone to change what they are doing.

  • It can limit the hearer’s freedom of action.
  • It can risk disagreement or embarrassment.
  • It can also signal closeness, trust, or a routine between people.

An act that may threaten face is called a face-threatening act (FTA).

What can a speaker do?

When making a request, a speaker can choose to:

  • state it directly;
  • use a conventional indirect form;
  • give a reason or add a softener;
  • hint and leave more for the hearer to infer.

These choices do not form a universal scale from rude to polite.

Revisit the bag example

Would you mind moving your bag?

What does the form make explicit? What does it leave open?

  • It is phrased as a question about willingness.
  • In context, it can function as a request.
  • Its effect depends on tone, relationship, and circumstances.

Prosody and situation matter

The same words can sound different when spoken:

  • gently, with a smile;
  • sharply, while pointing;
  • hurriedly in an emergency.

Written examples leave out some evidence available in face-to-face interaction.

Workshop: an extension request

Scenario: a student has been ill and needs more time for an assignment.

Compare:

  1. Give me an extension.
  2. Could I have an extension? I’ve been ill this week.
  3. I’ve been ill this week, and the deadline is tomorrow.

Workshop: roles and questions

For each version, discuss:

  • What is explicit? What must be inferred?
  • How might the instructor interpret it?
  • What additional context could change your judgment?

Debrief: what did the model help us see?

  • Requests can place competing demands on speaker and hearer.
  • Wording can manage, reduce, or heighten those demands.
  • The hearer’s interpretation is not guaranteed by the wording.

Frameworks help us ask questions; they do not tell us what every person must feel.

A careful limit on politeness models

Do not assume:

  • indirect wording is always more polite;
  • every community shares the same expectations;
  • one sentence reveals a speaker’s personality;
  • a model explains every feature of an interaction.

Integration and review

Put the questions together

For any utterance, ask:

  1. Locution: what words were said?
  2. Context: what situational, background, or co-textual clues matter?
  3. Illocution: what act may be performed?
  4. Perlocution: what effect may follow?
  5. Relationship: what face concerns or expectations might be relevant?

Slow analysis: work through one example

You left the door open.

Context: it is raining; the speaker is standing beside a wet floor.

Take a moment to answer the five questions.

What can we conclude?

We can support the interpretation that the utterance may function as a request to close the door.

We cannot know from the words alone that:

  • the speaker is angry;
  • the hearer recognized the request;
  • the hearer closed the door.

Exit check

Choose Do you have a pen? or It’s noisy in here.

Describe one context where the utterance performs an indirect act. Name the locution, likely illocution, one contextual clue, and one uncertainty.

Recap

Complete the statements in your own words:

  • Locution is…
  • Illocution is…
  • Perlocution is…
  • Face helps us ask…
  • A careful interpretation needs…